Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ac2e/3ac2ec410ac86be34c3479c4117466c247b1411d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d6c3/8d6c3208a98a04c133c77814dcb12d444671965b" alt="Samsung TL240 front Samsung TL240 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2017
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternative Name is ST5000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung TL240, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is very well matched and they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The WG-50 was released 7 years after the TL240 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the WG-50 scores versus the TL240 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung TL240. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung TL240
WG-50 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2017 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 90 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Ricoh WG-50
TL240 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung TL240
WG-50 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-50 has outer dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung TL240 has measurements of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung TL240 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the WG-50 and the TL240.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3bd7/f3bd7389e2883b02bb4eaa65d2c0dde90fea7bc3" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240 size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-50 and TL240 is 91 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4c5a/e4c5afb5debffd0debc30ebc7d7679fe3579ff95" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions merely by looking at specifications. The picture here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-50 and TL240.
Plainly, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-50 to resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The fresher WG-50 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf46f/cf46f625035863eae170f9ee7f339a2cc1097110" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8232/f82320a2a883d7313944e26061560455ae30f281" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung TL240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung TL240 |
Alternate name | - | ST5000 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2017-05-24 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4334 x 3256 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 4800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193g (0.43 pounds) | 160g (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $280 | $171 |