Clicky

Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240

Portability
91
Imaging
42
Features
39
Overall
40
Ricoh WG-50 front
 
Samsung TL240 front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
32
Overall
34

Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-50
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Launched May 2017
Samsung TL240
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 4800 (Raise to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
  • 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
  • Released January 2010
  • Alternative Name is ST5000
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240 Overview

The following is a in depth analysis of the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung TL240, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is very well matched and they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The WG-50 was released 7 years after the TL240 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the WG-50 scores versus the TL240 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung TL240

 WG-50 TL240 
ReleasedMay 2017January 2010Newer by 90 months
Manual focus Dial exact focusing

Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Ricoh WG-50

 TL240 WG-50 
Display sizing3.5"2.7"Larger display (+0.8")
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung TL240

 WG-50 TL240 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-50 has outer dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung TL240 has measurements of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).

Compare the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung TL240 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the WG-50 and the TL240.

Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-50 and TL240 is 91 and 95 respectively.

Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions merely by looking at specifications. The picture here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-50 and TL240.

Plainly, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-50 to resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The fresher WG-50 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-50
Portrait photography with Samsung TL240
42
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (16MP)
comes with face detection autofocus
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
28
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-50 Street photography highlights
Samsung TL240 Street photography highlights
62
image stabilization (Digital)
weather sealing
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
60
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with focus via touch
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
heavier than others (160g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-50 Sports photography features
Samsung TL240 Sports photography features
49
image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather sealing
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
43
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh WG-50
Travel photography with Samsung TL240
71
weather sealing
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
60
comes with focus via touch
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse function
heavier than others (160g)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (31mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-50 Landscape photography advice
Samsung TL240 Landscape photography advice
48
you can focus manually
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
weather sealing
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
37
screen larger than average (3.5")
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (31mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
no manual control
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh WG-50
Vlogging with Samsung TL240
33
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
comes with face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic port
27
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (31mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic port
heavier than others (160 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung TL240
 Ricoh WG-50Samsung TL240
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh WG-50 Samsung TL240
Alternate name - ST5000
Category Waterproof Ultracompact
Launched 2017-05-24 2010-01-06
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4334 x 3256
Maximum native ISO 6400 4800
Maximum enhanced ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 125 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 31-217mm (7.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/3.3-5.5
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inches 3.5 inches
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1500s
Continuous shutter speed 8.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) 5.00 m
Flash settings On, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Yes (Wireless) None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 193g (0.43 pounds) 160g (0.35 pounds)
Dimensions 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 pictures -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID D-LI92 SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $280 $171