Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL350
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ac2e/3ac2ec410ac86be34c3479c4117466c247b1411d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2103a/2103adbddc269259d95545a9af4d247992bac1f0" alt="Samsung TL350 front Samsung TL350 front"
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Also referred to as WB2000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung TL350, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and TL350 (10MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The WG-50 was unveiled 7 years after the TL350 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the WG-50 grades versus the TL350 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung TL350. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery and Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung TL350
WG-50 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2017 | ![]() | February 2010 | Newer by 89 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Ricoh WG-50
TL350 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung TL350
WG-50 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-50 enjoys exterior dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung TL350 has sizing of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung TL350 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-50 compared to the TL350.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8380e/8380ef8f1e568598978291642966dd8658cba459" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL350 size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL350 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-50 and TL350 is 91 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6384e/6384e13e7f247cf0820a3edcbe19f98e3e5733c4" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL350 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL350 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions simply by going through a spec sheet. The pic underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-50 and TL350.
Clearly, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should count on the Ricoh WG-50 to show more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The fresher WG-50 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/472b9/472b97766b621756629ec15f30cf3d2bc166980c" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL350 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL350 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7d16/e7d16e1751952a905c20dcbf3b494da3835daced" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung TL350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung TL350 |
Alternate name | - | WB2000 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2017-05-24 | 2010-02-20 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.4-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.20 m |
Flash modes | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) | 195 grams (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $280 | $400 |