Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB2200F
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Revealed January 2014
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB2200F, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the WB2200F (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WG-50 was brought out 3 years later than the WB2200F and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the WG-50 matches up versus the WB2200F for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-50 & Samsung WB2200F. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung WB2200F
WG-50 | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2017 | January 2014 | More recent by 42 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Ricoh WG-50
WB2200F | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung WB2200F
WG-50 | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-50 enjoys physical dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung WB2200F has specifications of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") along with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB2200F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-50 against the WB2200F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-50 and WB2200F is 91 and 59 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements only by reviewing technical specs. The visual here should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-50 and WB2200F.
As you can tell, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same MP so you can expect similar quality of pictures however you have to take the launch date of the products into consideration. The more recent WG-50 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung WB2200F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung WB2200F |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2017-05-24 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dot |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash modes | On, off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193 gr (0.43 lb) | 708 gr (1.56 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | BP-1410 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $280 | $599 |