Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB50F
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2017
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Ricoh WG-50 versus Samsung WB50F, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the WB50F (16MP) is relatively comparable and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-50 was manufactured 3 years after the WB50F which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the WG-50 matches up vs the WB50F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung WB50F. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung WB50F
| WG-50 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2017 |  | January 2014 | More modern by 42 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Ricoh WG-50
| WB50F | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung WB50F
| WG-50 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-50 has got outside dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB50F has specifications of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-50 versus Samsung WB50F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the WG-50 versus the WB50F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-50 and WB50F is 91 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes just by seeing technical specs. The pic underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-50 and WB50F.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical MP and you should expect comparable quality of files however you should take the production date of the cameras into account. The fresher WG-50 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung WB50F |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2017-05-24 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | On, off | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) | 207 grams (0.46 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $280 | $180 |
