Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB800F

On this page, we will be matching up the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung WB800F, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is relatively close and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The WG-50 was released 4 years later than the WB800F and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the WG-50 matches up against the WB800F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.

For anybody who is going to carry your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-50 comes with exterior measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Analyze the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung WB800F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the WG-50 and the WB800F.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-50 and WB800F is 91 and 92 respectively.

Usually, it can be hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing only by researching a spec sheet. The photograph below might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-50 and WB800F.

As you can see, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact megapixels so you should expect comparable quality of photos though you should really consider the release date of the cameras into account. The newer WG-50 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.