Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB800F
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung WB800F, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is relatively close and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-50 was released 4 years later than the WB800F and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the WG-50 matches up against the WB800F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung WB800F
WG-50 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2017 | January 2013 | Fresher by 54 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Ricoh WG-50
WB800F | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung WB800F
WG-50 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-50 comes with exterior measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung WB800F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the WG-50 and the WB800F.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-50 and WB800F is 91 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing only by researching a spec sheet. The photograph below might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-50 and WB800F.
As you can see, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact megapixels so you should expect comparable quality of photos though you should really consider the release date of the cameras into account. The newer WG-50 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung WB800F |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2017-05-24 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash modes | On, off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) | 218 grams (0.48 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $280 | $300 |