Clicky

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
91
Imaging
42
Features
39
Overall
40
Ricoh WG-50 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Ricoh WG-50
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Introduced May 2017
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Introduced February 2014
Photography Glossary

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Here, we will be matching up the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Sigma. The image resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is pretty close but the WG-50 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) posses different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The WG-50 was brought out 3 years after the DP2 Quattro which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick summation of how the WG-50 matches up versus the DP2 Quattro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 WG-50 DP2 Quattro 
IntroducedMay 2017February 2014Newer by 40 months

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Ricoh WG-50

 DP2 Quattro WG-50 
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 WG-50 DP2 Quattro 
Manually focus More exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-50 has got physical measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has dimensions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

See the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-50 and the DP2 Quattro.

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-50 and DP2 Quattro is 91 and 70 respectively.

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions just by viewing technical specs. The picture here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-50 and DP2 Quattro.

As you can tell, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The WG-50 due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will provide you with greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more modern WG-50 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-50 Portrait photography information
Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography information
42
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
provides face detection autofocus
no manual control
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
77
manual focus
good MP (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detection focusing
exports RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-50 Street photography factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography factors
62
image stabilization (Digital)
environment sealing
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
61
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-50 Sports photography info
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography info
49
image stabilization (Digital)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
environment sealing
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
48
good MP (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
fixed focal length (45mm)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-50 as a Travel photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Travel photography camera
71
environment sealing
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
53
good MP (20MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-50 as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Landscape photography camera
48
you can focus manually
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
environment sealing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
59
manual focus
good sized screen (3")
good MP (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (45mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh WG-50
Vlogging with Sigma DP2 Quattro
33
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
provides face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external mic support
9
no video shooting
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-50 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Ricoh WG-50Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Make Ricoh Sigma
Model Ricoh WG-50 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Type Waterproof Large Sensor Compact
Introduced 2017-05-24 2014-02-13
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TRUE III engine
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 5424 x 3616
Highest native ISO 6400 6400
Minimum native ISO 125 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 45mm (1x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/2.8
Macro focus range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 8.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) no built-in flash
Flash modes On, off no built-in flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Yes (Wireless) None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 193 grams (0.43 lb) 395 grams (0.87 lb)
Physical dimensions 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photographs -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model D-LI92 BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card -
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $280 $931