Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Introduced February 2014
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Sigma. The image resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is pretty close but the WG-50 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) posses different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-50 was brought out 3 years after the DP2 Quattro which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick summation of how the WG-50 matches up versus the DP2 Quattro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-50 and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
WG-50 | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2017 | February 2014 | Newer by 40 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Ricoh WG-50
DP2 Quattro | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
WG-50 | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-50 has got physical measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has dimensions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-50 and the DP2 Quattro.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-50 and DP2 Quattro is 91 and 70 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions just by viewing technical specs. The picture here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-50 and DP2 Quattro.
As you can tell, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The WG-50 due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will provide you with greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more modern WG-50 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh WG-50 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2017-05-24 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | On, off | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lb) | 395 grams (0.87 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $280 | $931 |