Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma fp
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ac2e/3ac2ec410ac86be34c3479c4117466c247b1411d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d2fe/1d2fed2caf199c62565b698420d940e61084850d" alt="Sigma fp front Sigma fp front"
84 Imaging
75 Features
79 Overall
76
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma fp Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Increase to 102400)
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 422g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
- Released July 2019
- Newer Model is Sigma fp L
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma fp Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Ricoh WG-50 and Sigma fp, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and fp (25MP) and the WG-50 (1/2.3") and fp (Full frame) have different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The WG-50 was launched 3 years earlier than the fp and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Sigma fp being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the WG-50 scores versus the fp with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma fp Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-50 & Sigma fp. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Sigma fp Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Sigma fp
WG-50 | fp |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma fp over the Ricoh WG-50
fp | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2019 | ![]() | May 2017 | Fresher by 25 months |
Display dimensions | 3.2" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 2100k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+1870k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Sigma fp
WG-50 | fp | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma fp Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-50 features outer dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sigma fp has proportions of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") and a weight of 422 grams (0.93 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-50 and Sigma fp in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-50 and the fp.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8aeeb/8aeebe3cd9637adba373d85af8c2272a05254270" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma fp size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma fp size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-50 and fp is 91 and 84 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf357/cf3579a236b5f45efe4075ef88a064f4d6805cc9" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma fp top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma fp top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma fp Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing just by looking at technical specs. The graphic below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-50 and fp.
As you have seen, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The WG-50 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Sigma fp will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics more aggressively. The older WG-50 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1f3c/a1f3c0bca8f6aa214a4150b3f390479d432336dc" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma fp sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma fp sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma fp Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3865d/3865d23fa88c1e9b2eb3e80a4edfeb482deb53ba" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma fp Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma fp Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma fp Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Sigma fp | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh WG-50 | Sigma fp |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2017-05-24 | 2019-07-11 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 23.9mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 858.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 25 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 6 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Leica L |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 30 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3.2 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 2,100 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per sec | 12.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | On, off | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | No |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) | 422 grams (0.93 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 wec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $280 | $2,050 |