Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A290
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ac2e/3ac2ec410ac86be34c3479c4117466c247b1411d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0798d/0798ddacd7eeb1289b58370a77a8d66bd4ccddbb" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front"
66 Imaging
54 Features
47 Overall
51
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Announced June 2010
- Replaced the Sony A230
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A290 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A290, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the A290 (14MP) is very similar but the WG-50 (1/2.3") and A290 (APS-C) feature different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The WG-50 was brought out 7 years after the A290 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the WG-50 matches up vs the A290 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A290 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-50 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A290. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Sony A290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Sony A290
WG-50 | A290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2017 | ![]() | June 2010 | More modern by 85 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Ricoh WG-50
A290 | WG-50 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony A290
WG-50 | A290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-50 offers physical measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sony A290 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") having a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A290 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the WG-50 against the A290.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be05/1be055a7f59a9d8d5d786b1838c961df2caf75b7" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A290 size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A290 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-50 and A290 is 91 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f70db/f70db76b16390a04ddaae6f4935e971a537a1dc9" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes merely by going over a spec sheet. The pic below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-50 and A290.
Clearly, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WG-50 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Ricoh WG-50 will deliver greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The younger WG-50 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e31d2/e31d204bfb6f7c039edadb7951cc15889110c0b3" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9cfd/b9cfdf38f5f2c04350defadb8bea28d4a2aadc3b" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A290 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2017-05-24 | 2010-06-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) | 549 gr (1.21 pounds) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 615 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 290 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $280 | $600 |