Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A380
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ac2e/3ac2ec410ac86be34c3479c4117466c247b1411d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d93c6/d93c6340561996445329eba0f2e50769f8f32759" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A380 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A380 front"
68 Imaging
53 Features
54 Overall
53
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A380 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017
(Full Review)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A380 Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sony A380, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the A380 (14MP) is relatively close but the WG-50 (1/2.3") and A380 (APS-C) have totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The WG-50 was introduced 7 years after the A380 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Sony A380 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the WG-50 grades against the A380 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A380 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-50 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A380. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Sony A380 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Sony A380
WG-50 | A380 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2017 | ![]() | August 2009 | More modern by 95 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A380 over the Ricoh WG-50
A380 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony A380
WG-50 | A380 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same screen size |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A380 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-50 comes with external measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sony A380 has sizing of 128mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") along with a weight of 519 grams (1.14 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sony A380 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-50 and the A380.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cfcb/3cfcba587f5501777730179c0defb9a8ed9cb30a" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A380 size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A380 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-50 and A380 is 91 and 68 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e74ca/e74cadb779cde013fee017770300e1b14bab6744" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A380 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A380 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A380 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through specifications. The image underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-50 and A380.
Plainly, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WG-50 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Ricoh WG-50 will provide you with greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The younger WG-50 is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2825c/2825cb48dc59115258ed4bbef2767ade1a6dd3fd" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A380 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A380 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A380 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13b21/13b215471aec404239fee248f83c97679ad7287f" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A380 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A380 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A380 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A380 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A380 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2017-05-24 | 2009-08-24 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) | 519 gr (1.14 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 128 x 97 x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 67 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 614 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 500 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $280 | $899 |