Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A900
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
54 Imaging
65 Features
62 Overall
63
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Announced October 2008
- Replacement is Sony A99
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A900 Overview
Below is a in-depth comparison of the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sony A900, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Ricoh and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and A900 (25MP) and the WG-50 (1/2.3") and A900 (Full frame) boast totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-50 was launched 8 years later than the A900 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the WG-50 grades versus the A900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-50 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Sony A900
| WG-50 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2017 | October 2008 | More recent by 105 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Ricoh WG-50
| A900 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony A900
| WG-50 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-50 comes with external dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sony A900 has measurements of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sony A900 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-50 vs the A900.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-50 and A900 is 91 and 54 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements just by checking a spec sheet. The photograph below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-50 and A900.
As you can see, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WG-50 due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Sony A900 will resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more recent WG-50 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A900 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2017-05-24 | 2008-10-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 25 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6048 x 4032 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/250s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193g (0.43 lb) | 895g (1.97 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 79 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1431 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | 880 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-FM500H |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
| Storage slots | Single | Two |
| Cost at launch | $280 | $2,736 |