Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A900
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ac2e/3ac2ec410ac86be34c3479c4117466c247b1411d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0947/b0947af385e09995bd1e56c5e9e9356bb14ab574" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 front"
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Announced October 2008
- Replacement is Sony A99
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A900 Overview
Below is a in-depth comparison of the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sony A900, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Ricoh and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and A900 (25MP) and the WG-50 (1/2.3") and A900 (Full frame) boast totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The WG-50 was launched 8 years later than the A900 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the WG-50 grades versus the A900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-50 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Sony A900
WG-50 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2017 | ![]() | October 2008 | More recent by 105 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Ricoh WG-50
A900 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony A900
WG-50 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-50 comes with external dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sony A900 has measurements of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sony A900 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-50 vs the A900.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bafb4/bafb41152fee00c25a90d68f01b48ba73b21e3f6" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A900 size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A900 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-50 and A900 is 91 and 54 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e82e3/e82e3e03a8bf80152943e2c9516da6aa9ee486e2" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A900 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A900 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements just by checking a spec sheet. The photograph below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-50 and A900.
As you can see, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WG-50 due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Sony A900 will resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more recent WG-50 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/389f5/389f582536aa60e370bb799bfe52160bed499481" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A900 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A900 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/964e5/964e5933ccc7f1bce9dddc13eeb3a4ce908c142c" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A900 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2017-05-24 | 2008-10-22 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 25 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6048 x 4032 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193g (0.43 lb) | 895g (1.97 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 880 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Storage slots | Single | Two |
Cost at launch | $280 | $2,736 |