Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A6400
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ac2e/3ac2ec410ac86be34c3479c4117466c247b1411d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11515/1151579478081071cc2b1eedc776984b8b96fb07" alt="Sony Alpha a6400 front Sony Alpha a6400 front"
83 Imaging
69 Features
88 Overall
76
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A6400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Bump to 102400)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 403g - 120 x 67 x 50mm
- Released January 2019
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A6400 Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sony A6400, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and A6400 (24MP) and the WG-50 (1/2.3") and A6400 (APS-C) use different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The WG-50 was released 20 months before the A6400 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Sony A6400 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summary of how the WG-50 grades against the A6400 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A6400 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-50 & Sony Alpha a6400. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Sony A6400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Sony A6400
WG-50 | A6400 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6400 over the Ricoh WG-50
A6400 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2019 | ![]() | May 2017 | More modern by 20 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony A6400
WG-50 | A6400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A6400 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-50 enjoys physical measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sony A6400 has specifications of 120mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") with a weight of 403 grams (0.89 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sony A6400 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the WG-50 and the A6400.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88ebb/88ebbe9cc3539bba2b1bf9c27d5502cf4294b6d5" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A6400 size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A6400 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-50 and A6400 is 91 and 83 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14886/148868a8941ddc22a8b2e93898b15c76e76c987a" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A6400 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A6400 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A6400 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes just by reading a spec sheet. The image underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-50 and A6400.
Clearly, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WG-50 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Sony A6400 will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged WG-50 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d153/2d1539771626e90f4bcc7bb36db503f0bca06df0" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A6400 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A6400 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A6400 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9ec0/e9ec062cfc81179e9fda8a470d84284b1f7fd8f4" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A6400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A6400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A6400 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Alpha a6400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Alpha a6400 |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2017-05-24 | 2019-01-15 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 32000 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per second | 11.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | On, off | Off, auto, on, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, XAVC-S |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193g (0.43 lb) | 403g (0.89 lb) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 120 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 83 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | 410 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $280 | $898 |