Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony H200
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
67 Imaging
45 Features
31 Overall
39
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Launched January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony H200 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony H200, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the H200 (20MP) is very similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-50 was released 4 years after the H200 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summary of how the WG-50 scores versus the H200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony H200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-50 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Sony H200
| WG-50 | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2017 |  | January 2013 | More modern by 54 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Ricoh WG-50
| H200 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony H200
| WG-50 | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-50 enjoys exterior dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sony H200 has dimensions of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") having a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony H200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the WG-50 and the H200.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-50 and H200 is 91 and 67 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes purely by going over technical specs. The picture underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-50 and H200.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Sony H200 to offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The younger WG-50 will have an edge in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony H200 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2017-05-24 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 2920 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 20cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 6.80 m |
| Flash modes | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193g (0.43 lb) | 530g (1.17 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | 240 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | AA |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $280 | $250 |
