Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX1
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
67 Imaging
32 Features
36 Overall
33
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 544g - 115 x 83 x 92mm
- Revealed April 2009
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX1 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sony HX1, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and HX1 (9MP) and the WG-50 (1/2.3") and HX1 (1/2.4") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-50 was introduced 8 years later than the HX1 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summary of how the WG-50 scores versus the HX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-50 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Sony HX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Sony HX1
WG-50 | HX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2017 | April 2009 | More recent by 99 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX1 over the Ricoh WG-50
HX1 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony HX1
WG-50 | HX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-50 enjoys exterior measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sony HX1 has specifications of 115mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 544 grams (1.20 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sony HX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-50 vs the HX1.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the WG-50 and HX1 is 91 and 67 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements only by checking a spec sheet. The graphic here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-50 and HX1.
Clearly, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WG-50 using its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Ricoh WG-50 will resolve more detail using its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The fresher WG-50 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX1 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2017-05-24 | 2009-04-22 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-560mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 9.20 m |
Flash modes | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1440x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lb) | 544 grams (1.20 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 115 x 83 x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $280 | $47,999 |