Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX200V
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Released May 2012
- Earlier Model is Sony HX100V
- Refreshed by Sony HX300
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX200V Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sony HX200V, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the HX200V (18MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-50 was brought out 5 years later than the HX200V and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a short introduction of how the WG-50 matches up versus the HX200V in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX200V Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-50 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Sony HX200V
WG-50 | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2017 | May 2012 | More recent by 62 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Ricoh WG-50
HX200V | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony HX200V
WG-50 | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-50 features external dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sony HX200V has dimensions of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") having a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sony HX200V in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the WG-50 and the HX200V.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-50 and HX200V is 91 and 66 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to envision the contrast in sensor measurements merely by checking out specifications. The visual here should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-50 and HX200V.
To sum up, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Sony HX200V to provide greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more recent WG-50 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX200V Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2017-05-24 | 2012-05-11 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 12.40 m |
Flash options | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193g (0.43 lbs) | 583g (1.29 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 450 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $280 | $480 |