Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ac2e/3ac2ec410ac86be34c3479c4117466c247b1411d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49a60/49a601b81dc9ac950ac3b4b1df8dd7ab514aa7ad" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front"
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Released February 2013
- Previous Model is Sony HX200V
- Updated by Sony HX400V
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sony HX300, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the HX300 (20MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The WG-50 was manufactured 4 years after the HX300 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a quick overview of how the WG-50 grades vs the HX300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-50 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Sony HX300
WG-50 | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2017 | ![]() | February 2013 | Newer by 52 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Ricoh WG-50
HX300 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony HX300
WG-50 | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-50 has got exterior dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sony HX300 has sizing of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sony HX300 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the WG-50 compared to the HX300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e804/4e804a64da3723612b94a7928644c4179d0b553f" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300 size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-50 and HX300 is 91 and 63 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7eb2/d7eb2955148ad12fddc7fa5d683e51cbd31e9888" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions only by looking at technical specs. The pic below may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-50 and HX300.
As you have seen, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Sony HX300 to resolve greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern WG-50 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa4e2/aa4e2b10b4a36637dc29726434e54f1ec58b27d4" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/867a1/867a17be5e3f5a520cc4a0ccf11b89b486b416b0" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2017-05-24 | 2013-02-20 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash settings | On, off | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) | 623 grams (1.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $280 | $339 |