Clicky

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300

Portability
91
Imaging
42
Features
39
Overall
40
Ricoh WG-50 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front
Portability
63
Imaging
44
Features
51
Overall
46

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-50
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Introduced May 2017
Sony HX300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
  • 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
  • Released February 2013
  • Previous Model is Sony HX200V
  • Updated by Sony HX400V
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300 Overview

Here, we will be contrasting the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sony HX300, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the HX300 (20MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The WG-50 was manufactured 4 years after the HX300 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a quick overview of how the WG-50 grades vs the HX300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Sony HX300

 WG-50 HX300 
ReleasedMay 2017February 2013Newer by 52 months

Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Ricoh WG-50

 HX300 WG-50 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution921k230kSharper screen (+691k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony HX300

 WG-50 HX300 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-50 has got exterior dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sony HX300 has sizing of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).

Analyze the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sony HX300 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the WG-50 compared to the HX300.

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-50 and HX300 is 91 and 63 respectively.

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions only by looking at technical specs. The pic below may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-50 and HX300.

As you have seen, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Sony HX300 to resolve greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern WG-50 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-50 Portrait photography highlights
Sony HX300 Portrait photography highlights
42
manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
42
focusing manually
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-50 Street photography advice
Sony HX300 Street photography advice
62
has image stabilization (Digital)
environment proofing
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
50
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Optical)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
more heavy than competition (623 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh WG-50
Sports photography with Sony HX300
49
has image stabilization (Digital)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
environment proofing
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
55
long zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-50 Travel photography details
Sony HX300 Travel photography details
71
environment proofing
MP count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
54
decent megapixels (20MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1200mm)
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (623g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-50 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony HX300 as a Landscape photography camera
48
manual focus
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
MP count decent (16MP)
environment proofing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual control
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
48
focusing manually
pretty wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
missing Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-50 as a Vlogging camera
Sony HX300 as a Vlogging camera
33
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
comes with face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone support
25
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing microphone socket
more heavy than competition (623g)
Photography Glossary

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-50 and Sony HX300
 Ricoh WG-50Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Sony
Model Ricoh WG-50 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
Category Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2017-05-24 2013-02-20
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 5184 x 3888
Maximum native ISO 6400 12800
Min native ISO 125 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/2.8-6.3
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 921 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 8.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) -
Flash settings On, off -
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Yes (Wireless) None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 193 grams (0.43 lbs) 623 grams (1.37 lbs)
Physical dimensions 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 images -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model D-LI92 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card -
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $280 $339