Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony S950
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ac2e/3ac2ec410ac86be34c3479c4117466c247b1411d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef442/ef442706a6d23aa5b3272802e51f0b8549e6b0c4" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950 front"
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony S950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Video
- 33-132mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 167g - 93 x 56 x 24mm
- Launched February 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony S950 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony S950, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and S950 (10MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The WG-50 was launched 8 years later than the S950 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the WG-50 matches up against the S950 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony S950 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-50 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Sony S950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Sony S950
WG-50 | S950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2017 | ![]() | February 2009 | More recent by 101 months |
Reasons to pick Sony S950 over the Ricoh WG-50
S950 | WG-50 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony S950
WG-50 | S950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony S950 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-50 features exterior dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sony S950 has proportions of 93mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony S950 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the WG-50 vs the S950.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72fe0/72fe0ee0be4c820d4761dda4527d673a727c4304" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony S950 size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony S950 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the WG-50 and S950 is 91 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8bb2/e8bb2ddcc067ae9583e36e990ec81f81efc55354" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony S950 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony S950 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony S950 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reviewing technical specs. The visual here may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-50 and S950.
As you have seen, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-50 to offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more modern WG-50 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/239d9/239d9fb57e1d032aff0eb3a65114c961c07ba1f2" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony S950 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony S950 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony S950 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5abde/5abde15745afd668f4f511c04a501e53343d88f6" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony S950 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony S950 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony S950 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2017-05-24 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.3-5.2 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lb) | 167 grams (0.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 93 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $280 | $130 |