Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony T900
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2017
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced February 2009
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony T900 Overview
Here is a detailed overview of the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony T900, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and T900 (12MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-50 was brought out 8 years later than the T900 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the WG-50 matches up vs the T900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-50 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Sony T900
WG-50 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2017 | February 2009 | Fresher by 101 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Ricoh WG-50
T900 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3.5" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony T900
WG-50 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-50 features external dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sony T900 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony T900 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the WG-50 and the T900.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-50 and T900 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing simply by going over specifications. The photograph underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-50 and T900.
To sum up, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-50 to deliver more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The more recent WG-50 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony T900 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2017-05-24 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) | 143 gr (0.32 pounds) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $280 | $300 |