Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony WX220
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ac2e/3ac2ec410ac86be34c3479c4117466c247b1411d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad078/ad078245ad2a75d1f90964f92a2525732af1b1b1" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 front"
96 Imaging
43 Features
41 Overall
42
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony WX220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
- Released February 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony WX220 Overview
The following is a in-depth comparison of the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sony WX220, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the WX220 (18MP) is very well matched and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The WG-50 was unveiled 3 years after the WX220 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Sony WX220 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick view of how the WG-50 matches up vs the WX220 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony WX220 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-50 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Sony WX220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Sony WX220
WG-50 | WX220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2017 | ![]() | February 2014 | Newer by 40 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Sony WX220 over the Ricoh WG-50
WX220 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony WX220
WG-50 | WX220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony WX220 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-50 features outside measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sony WX220 has specifications of 92mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sony WX220 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-50 versus the WX220.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd87b/cd87b723db58cb61990cdba3616bf5b3755f9b0f" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony WX220 size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony WX220 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-50 and WX220 is 91 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f028/7f0287c93cb59842f3c0fea1ab64d20d0a18df80" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony WX220 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony WX220 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony WX220 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions only by checking technical specs. The picture here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-50 and WX220.
As you can tell, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Sony WX220 to resolve extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more modern WG-50 is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5cdbd/5cdbddfdc6dfd41471d5827a025525c4d7351c5f" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony WX220 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony WX220 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony WX220 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1a3d/b1a3d5afaf12c13f4679b9ce4022b008f96cbcfa" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony WX220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony WX220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony WX220 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2017-05-24 | 2014-02-12 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.70 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | On, off | Auto, on, slow synchro, off, advanced |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) | 121 gr (0.27 pounds) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 210 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $280 | $198 |