Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A99
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ac2e/3ac2ec410ac86be34c3479c4117466c247b1411d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5a22/b5a22692b0ab5776db7830209793272200c825df" alt="Sony SLT-A99 front Sony SLT-A99 front"
57 Imaging
69 Features
88 Overall
76
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2017
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 812g - 147 x 111 x 78mm
- Launched December 2012
- Superseded the Sony A900
- Updated by Sony A99 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A99 Overview
Here is a complete review of the Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A99, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Ricoh and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and A99 (24MP) and the WG-50 (1/2.3") and A99 (Full frame) provide different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The WG-50 was launched 4 years later than the A99 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Sony A99 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the WG-50 matches up vs the A99 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A99 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-50 & Sony SLT-A99. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Sony A99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Sony A99
WG-50 | A99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2017 | ![]() | December 2012 | Fresher by 55 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A99 over the Ricoh WG-50
A99 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+999k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony A99
WG-50 | A99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A99 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera often, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-50 features outer dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sony A99 has dimensions of 147mm x 111mm x 78mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 3.1") and a weight of 812 grams (1.79 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A99 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the WG-50 versus the A99.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27c22/27c22cc2a8ffbc4a8ea18d80870c6b2821521386" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A99 size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A99 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-50 and A99 is 91 and 57 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc18b/dc18bb720152be565a2fb53ab94fd56635074b64" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A99 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A99 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A99 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing just by looking at specs. The visual here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-50 and A99.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The WG-50 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony A99 will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The younger WG-50 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aee57/aee571e4991d06cfbe5b1d34aff3f7e7a5436add" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A99 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A99 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A99 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8cb6/e8cb6d07b6c6da99bea384bb96f487defa515a46" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A99 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A99 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A99 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Sony SLT-A99 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Sony SLT-A99 |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2017-05-24 | 2012-12-12 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 19 |
Cross type focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.71x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) | 812 grams (1.79 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 147 x 111 x 78mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 89 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.0 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1555 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 500 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo; SD, SDHC and SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | Two |
Launch price | $280 | $1,998 |