Ricoh WG-50 vs Zeiss ZX1
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
67 Imaging
79 Features
62 Overall
72
Ricoh WG-50 vs Zeiss ZX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2017
(Full Review)
- 37MP - Full frame Sensor
- 4.34" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 51200
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 35mm (F2-22) lens
- 800g - 142 x 93 x 46mm
- Launched September 2018
Ricoh WG-50 vs Zeiss ZX1 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Ricoh WG-50 vs Zeiss ZX1, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Zeiss. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and ZX1 (37MP) and the WG-50 (1/2.3") and ZX1 (Full frame) provide different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-50 was unveiled 16 months earlier than the ZX1 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Zeiss ZX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise view of how the WG-50 scores against the ZX1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Zeiss ZX1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-50 and Zeiss ZX1. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery and Zeiss ZX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Zeiss ZX1
WG-50 | ZX1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Zeiss ZX1 over the Ricoh WG-50
ZX1 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2018 | May 2017 | Newer by 16 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimensions | 4.34" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+1.64") | |
Screen resolution | 2765k | 230k | Sharper screen (+2535k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Zeiss ZX1
WG-50 | ZX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Zeiss ZX1 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-50 comes with physical dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Zeiss ZX1 has sizing of 142mm x 93mm x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") having a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-50 vs Zeiss ZX1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the WG-50 versus the ZX1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-50 and ZX1 is 91 and 67 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Zeiss ZX1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions only by reviewing technical specs. The picture underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-50 and ZX1.
As you have seen, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The WG-50 using its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF harder and the Zeiss ZX1 will deliver extra detail having an extra 21MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged WG-50 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Zeiss ZX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-50 vs Zeiss ZX1 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Zeiss ZX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Zeiss |
Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Zeiss ZX1 |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2017-05-24 | 2018-09-27 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 37 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 7488 x 4992 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 255 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2-22 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 4.34" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 2,765k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 6,221k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | On, off | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193 gr (0.43 lb) | 800 gr (1.76 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 142 x 93 x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | 512GB internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $280 | - |