Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung NX200
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
90 Imaging
61 Features
57 Overall
59
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Announced February 2018
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Announced February 2012
- Old Model is Samsung NX100
- Updated by Samsung NX210
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung NX200 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung NX200, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-6 (20MP) and the NX200 (20MP) is fairly comparable but the WG-6 (1/2.3") and NX200 (APS-C) feature different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-6 was manufactured 6 years after the NX200 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-6 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the WG-6 scores against the NX200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung NX200. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-6 Gallery and Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Samsung NX200
| WG-6 | NX200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2018 |  | February 2012 | More modern by 73 months |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 614k | Clearer display (+426k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Ricoh WG-6
| NX200 | WG-6 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung NX200
| WG-6 | NX200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-6 enjoys exterior measurements of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX200 has sizing of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung NX200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the WG-6 vs the NX200.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-6 and NX200 is 89 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizes merely by checking out technical specs. The image here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-6 and NX200.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses the exact same megapixel count but different sensor sizes. The WG-6 has the smaller sensor which is going to make achieving bokeh tougher. The younger WG-6 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-6 | Samsung NX200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-6 | Samsung NX200 |
| Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2018-02-21 | 2012-02-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 15 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 32 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Flash on, flash off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840x2160 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Supports FlashAir SD cards | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 246 grams (0.54 pounds) | 223 grams (0.49 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 69 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 618 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | 330 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BC1030 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $271 | $818 |