Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung SL202
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Earlier Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL50
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung SL202, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-6 (20MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-6 was introduced 9 years later than the SL202 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the WG-6 matches up against the SL202 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung SL202. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh WG-6 Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Samsung SL202
| WG-6 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2018 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 110 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Ricoh WG-6
| SL202 | WG-6 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung SL202
| WG-6 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-6 comes with exterior measurements of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has specifications of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung SL202 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-6 compared to the SL202.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-6 and SL202 is 89 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-6 and SL202.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should count on the Ricoh WG-6 to result in extra detail using its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots more aggressively. The fresher WG-6 should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-6 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-6 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also Known as | - | PL50 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2018-02-21 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Flash on, flash off | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840x2160 | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Supports FlashAir SD cards | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 246 grams (0.54 pounds) | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $271 | $140 |