Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung TL240
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
95 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Alternate Name is ST5000
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung TL240, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the WG-6 (20MP) and TL240 (14MP) but they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-6 was launched 8 years later than the TL240 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-6 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summary of how the WG-6 grades against the TL240 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung TL240. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-6 Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Samsung TL240
| WG-6 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2018 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 99 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Ricoh WG-6
| TL240 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung TL240
| WG-6 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-6 features physical measurements of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung TL240 has dimensions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung TL240 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the WG-6 vs the TL240.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the WG-6 and TL240 is 89 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizing merely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-6 and TL240.
Clearly, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-6 to provide extra detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The newer WG-6 should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-6 | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-6 | Samsung TL240 |
| Otherwise known as | - | ST5000 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2018-02-21 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 4800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Flash on, flash off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840x2160 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Supports FlashAir SD cards | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 246 grams (0.54 lb) | 160 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $271 | $171 |