Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung TL320
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Announced February 2009
- Additionally referred to as WB1000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung TL320, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the WG-6 (20MP) and TL320 (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-6 was released 9 years after the TL320 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-6 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the WG-6 matches up against the TL320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung TL320. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-6 Gallery and Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Samsung TL320
| WG-6 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2018 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 110 months |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Ricoh WG-6
| TL320 | WG-6 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung TL320
| WG-6 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera, you should consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-6 features exterior dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL320 has sizing of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung TL320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is the front view size comparison of the WG-6 vs the TL320.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-6 and TL320 is 89 and 98 respectively.
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes simply by seeing specifications. The picture below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-6 and TL320.
To sum up, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should count on the Ricoh WG-6 to provide extra detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more modern WG-6 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-6 | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-6 | Samsung TL320 |
| Alternative name | - | WB1000 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2018-02-21 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Flash on, flash off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840x2160 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Supports FlashAir SD cards | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 246g (0.54 pounds) | - |
| Dimensions | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $271 | $380 |