Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07dc5/07dc58b4a79864661a81726797271145ae172467" alt="Ricoh WG-6 front Ricoh WG-6 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f42c9/f42c9a361334ffc5c5c43c170deef3b574f4dd47" alt="Sigma DP2 Quattro front Sigma DP2 Quattro front"
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Announced February 2018
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Released February 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Here, we are comparing the Ricoh WG-6 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Sigma. The resolution of the WG-6 (20MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is very similar but the WG-6 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) provide different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The WG-6 was revealed 4 years later than the DP2 Quattro and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-6 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the WG-6 matches up against the DP2 Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-6 & Sigma DP2 Quattro. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-6 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
WG-6 | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | ![]() | February 2014 | More recent by 49 months |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer display (+120k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Ricoh WG-6
DP2 Quattro | WG-6 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-6 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
WG-6 | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-6 comes with outer measurements of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-6 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-6 compared to the DP2 Quattro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02476/02476098a8f3c6c33e6bd6a8d89b1ed764f6f4b4" alt="Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-6 and DP2 Quattro is 89 and 70 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0299/f0299245bdae5e7401ec98270d2aada31893092b" alt="Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements purely by going over specifications. The photograph here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-6 and DP2 Quattro.
Plainly, both cameras feature the identical resolution but different sensor measurements. The WG-6 includes the tinier sensor which should make getting shallower DOF more difficult. The fresher WG-6 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fcd16/fcd16a98f9d356c70fec3dd7f734e748df7db29f" alt="Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83958/83958e00bb4fc4930f6a9638768395b7b21d1a31" alt="Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Ricoh WG-6 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model type | Ricoh WG-6 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2018-02-21 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5424 x 3616 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Flash on, flash off | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840x2160 | - |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Supports FlashAir SD cards | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 246 grams (0.54 lbs) | 395 grams (0.87 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $271 | $931 |