Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07dc5/07dc58b4a79864661a81726797271145ae172467" alt="Ricoh WG-6 front Ricoh WG-6 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46cfd/46cfd6b1b2504d733a07dd4a231b6abe09baa859" alt="Sigma SD1 Merrill front Sigma SD1 Merrill front"
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Announced February 2018
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Revealed April 2012
- Old Model is Sigma SD1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Ricoh and Sigma. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the WG-6 (20MP) and SD1 Merrill (15MP) and the WG-6 (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) boast different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The WG-6 was released 5 years after the SD1 Merrill which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-6 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a brief overview of how the WG-6 grades versus the SD1 Merrill with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-6 and Sigma SD1 Merrill. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-6 Gallery and Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
WG-6 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2018 | ![]() | April 2012 | More modern by 72 months |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Ricoh WG-6
SD1 Merrill | WG-6 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-6 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
WG-6 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-6 comes with outside dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD1 Merrill has dimensions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") and a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the WG-6 and the SD1 Merrill.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb16a/cb16aa2fadf9b636280bb4b48d77978df87404e1" alt="Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-6 and SD1 Merrill is 89 and 57 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe627/fe627a95537c61c4ce3e8fde9f917876a1525556" alt="Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by viewing a spec sheet. The picture here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-6 and SD1 Merrill.
Clearly, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WG-6 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Ricoh WG-6 will render greater detail as a result of its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs more aggressively. The younger WG-6 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e058/2e0582b4073af0deaee490460a302285464102f2" alt="Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d4d2/5d4d2d84c68e428c92be0c76b927b9bbea8eeb57" alt="Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Ricoh WG-6 | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh WG-6 | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2018-02-21 | 2012-04-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Dual True II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4800 x 3200 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Flash on, flash off | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840x2160 | - |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Supports FlashAir SD cards | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 246g (0.54 pounds) | 790g (1.74 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $271 | $2,339 |