Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony T900
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Older Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced February 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony T900 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony T900, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the WG-6 (20MP) and T900 (12MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-6 was brought out 9 years later than the T900 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-6 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the WG-6 grades versus the T900 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-6 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-6 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Sony T900
| WG-6 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2018 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 110 months |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 922k | Sharper screen (+118k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Ricoh WG-6
| T900 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-6 and Sony T900
| WG-6 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-6 comes with exterior dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony T900 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony T900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-6 vs the T900.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the WG-6 and T900 is 89 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing only by looking at technical specs. The visual here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-6 and T900.
As you have seen, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-6 to give extra detail having its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more modern WG-6 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-6 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-6 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2018-02-21 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Flash on, flash off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840x2160 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Supports FlashAir SD cards | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 246 gr (0.54 lbs) | 143 gr (0.32 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $271 | $300 |