Ricoh WG-70 vs Ricoh WG-M1
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Ricoh WG-70 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-70 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Ricoh WG-70 versus Ricoh WG-M1, both Waterproof digital cameras and both of them are built by Ricoh. The image resolution of the WG-70 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is pretty similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe WG-70 was unveiled 5 years later than the WG-M1 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the WG-70 scores vs the WG-M1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-70 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-70 and Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| WG-70 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2020 |  | September 2014 | Fresher by 66 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Ricoh WG-70
| WG-M1 | WG-70 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Ricoh WG-M1
| WG-70 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-70 has got external measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-70 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the WG-70 vs the WG-M1.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the WG-70 and WG-M1 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing just by reviewing technical specs. The graphic underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-70 and WG-M1.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-70 to offer you extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The younger WG-70 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh WG-70 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-70 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-70 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2020-02-04 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | (1×) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 1.5" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | On, off | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193g (0.43 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | 350 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $280 | $2,000 |
