Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1L
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5df4a/5df4a7bd7b9b88dd2f51805c9d7765d7c23b749f" alt="Ricoh WG-70 front Ricoh WG-70 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a851/5a851ef78e48f8e044878a725f768ce7cb93cf0c" alt="Samsung GX-1L front Samsung GX-1L front"
69 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1L Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced February 2020
- Successor is Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 570g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Introduced February 2006
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1L Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Ricoh WG-70 versus Samsung GX-1L, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the WG-70 (16MP) and GX-1L (6MP) and the WG-70 (1/2.3") and GX-1L (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The WG-70 was announced 14 years after the GX-1L which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1L being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the WG-70 matches up versus the GX-1L when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1L Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-70 & Samsung GX-1L. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery & Samsung GX-1L Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung GX-1L
WG-70 | GX-1L | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2020 | ![]() | February 2006 | More modern by 170 months |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 210k | Crisper screen (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1L over the Ricoh WG-70
GX-1L | WG-70 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung GX-1L
WG-70 | GX-1L | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1L Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-70 features outside dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-1L has sizing of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 570 grams (1.26 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-70 versus Samsung GX-1L in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at the time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the WG-70 against the GX-1L.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7342/e7342415c7b32d8866253ee25b12f8d757e77fb5" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1L size comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1L size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-70 and GX-1L is 91 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77978/779780d56096070efe01c85eebe3b3329b0a39d8" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1L top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1L top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1L Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizes merely by looking at technical specs. The pic underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-70 and GX-1L.
As you have seen, both cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WG-70 using its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Ricoh WG-70 will resolve more detail with its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The younger WG-70 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49231/492313b763cd33b3ee37138ba83844a614ed8555" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1L sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1L sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61a51/61a510d77cf4ace03225f92b4ee88e67dec72372" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1L Specifications
Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung GX-1L | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung GX-1L |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2020-02-04 | 2006-02-24 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3008 x 2008 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 5 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 210k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 7.50 m |
Flash options | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193g (0.43 pounds) | 570g (1.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/MMC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $280 | $0 |