Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1S
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released February 2020
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Released January 2006
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Below is a thorough review of the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung GX-1S, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-70 (16MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the WG-70 (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WG-70 was launched 14 years later than the GX-1S and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the WG-70 matches up versus the GX-1S when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-70 & Samsung GX-1S. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery & Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung GX-1S
| WG-70 | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2020 | January 2006 | More recent by 172 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 210k | Crisper screen (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Ricoh WG-70
| GX-1S | WG-70 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung GX-1S
| WG-70 | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-70 features outer measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-1S has sizing of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung GX-1S in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-70 compared to the GX-1S.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-70 and GX-1S is 91 and 68 respectively.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements only by going through technical specs. The visual below might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-70 and GX-1S.
As you can tell, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WG-70 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more challenging and the Ricoh WG-70 will show greater detail utilizing its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots more aggressively. The younger WG-70 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
| Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung GX-1S | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung GX-1S |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2020-02-04 | 2006-01-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 6MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 210k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash options | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lb) | 605 grams (1.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/MMC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $280 | $850 |