Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1S
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5df4a/5df4a7bd7b9b88dd2f51805c9d7765d7c23b749f" alt="Ricoh WG-70 front Ricoh WG-70 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67f84/67f84ba37112e0b724a4e30ca9f4099db427b4f9" alt="Samsung GX-1S front Samsung GX-1S front"
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released February 2020
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Released January 2006
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Below is a thorough review of the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung GX-1S, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-70 (16MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the WG-70 (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The WG-70 was launched 14 years later than the GX-1S and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the WG-70 matches up versus the GX-1S when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-70 & Samsung GX-1S. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery & Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung GX-1S
WG-70 | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2020 | ![]() | January 2006 | More recent by 172 months |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 210k | Crisper screen (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Ricoh WG-70
GX-1S | WG-70 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung GX-1S
WG-70 | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-70 features outer measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-1S has sizing of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung GX-1S in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-70 compared to the GX-1S.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5827d/5827d2015605df76095e325b152451a29a63a322" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1S size comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1S size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-70 and GX-1S is 91 and 68 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52ee2/52ee262ed36b23f13b18057553036fc999eddf2e" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1S top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1S top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements only by going through technical specs. The visual below might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-70 and GX-1S.
As you can tell, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WG-70 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more challenging and the Ricoh WG-70 will show greater detail utilizing its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots more aggressively. The younger WG-70 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2e69/e2e690e96cb5514fc458ede8a1ef5c95e5b16f33" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1S sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1S sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e908a/e908a7c6c4d45ffd792954f67b8dda61273e2a91" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung GX-1S | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung GX-1S |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2020-02-04 | 2006-01-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 6MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3008 x 2008 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 2.5" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 210k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash options | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lb) | 605 grams (1.33 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/MMC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $280 | $850 |