Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung HZ10W
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5df4a/5df4a7bd7b9b88dd2f51805c9d7765d7c23b749f" alt="Ricoh WG-70 front Ricoh WG-70 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d771b/d771b66d884c4e557825e4da5dca0dcce000b804" alt="Samsung HZ10W front Samsung HZ10W front"
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced February 2020
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Launched May 2009
- Additionally Known as WB500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Ricoh WG-70 versus Samsung HZ10W, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the WG-70 (16MP) and HZ10W (10MP) but they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The WG-70 was introduced 10 years later than the HZ10W and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the WG-70 scores vs the HZ10W with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-70 & Samsung HZ10W. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery & Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung HZ10W
WG-70 | HZ10W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2020 | ![]() | May 2009 | More recent by 131 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Ricoh WG-70
HZ10W | WG-70 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung HZ10W
WG-70 | HZ10W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical screen size |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-70 has physical dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung HZ10W has dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-70 versus Samsung HZ10W in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the WG-70 versus the HZ10W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7611e/7611e95fc839fb5fe9654f30f506aefd644113aa" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung HZ10W size comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung HZ10W size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-70 and HZ10W is 91 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c33b5/c33b5b40ad3fa8eed7d3abc844181ad7702a60e4" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung HZ10W top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung HZ10W top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements only by reading through specifications. The graphic below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-70 and HZ10W.
To sum up, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can count on the Ricoh WG-70 to resolve greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more recent WG-70 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94c0a/94c0adf4cf67e5d8e2bd2cb9dce7e407e81befec" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung HZ10W sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung HZ10W sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21996/21996480b3569909c712ae2c94237e9f8484de0f" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung HZ10W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung HZ10W |
Also called as | - | WB500 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2020-02-04 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2432 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.3-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash options | On, off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) | 249 gr (0.55 lbs) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $280 | $300 |