Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung HZ30W
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung HZ30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched February 2020
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2010
- Additionally Known as WB600
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung HZ30W Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung HZ30W, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the WG-70 (16MP) and HZ30W (12MP) but they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-70 was unveiled 10 years later than the HZ30W and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summary of how the WG-70 grades vs the HZ30W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung HZ30W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-70 & Samsung HZ30W. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery & Samsung HZ30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung HZ30W
| WG-70 | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2020 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 123 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ30W over the Ricoh WG-70
| HZ30W | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung HZ30W
| WG-70 | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung HZ30W Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-70 features outer measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ30W has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung HZ30W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the WG-70 and the HZ30W.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-70 and HZ30W is 91 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung HZ30W Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements purely by viewing technical specs. The visual here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-70 and HZ30W.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-70 to result in greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more recent WG-70 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung HZ30W Specifications
| Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung HZ30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung HZ30W |
| Alternative name | - | WB600 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2020-02-04 | 2010-01-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193 gr (0.43 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SC/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $280 | $280 |