Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX30
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5df4a/5df4a7bd7b9b88dd2f51805c9d7765d7c23b749f" alt="Ricoh WG-70 front Ricoh WG-70 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce26f/ce26f126ddb897ecf80630f38a706a60c1b9d696" alt="Samsung NX30 front Samsung NX30 front"
75 Imaging
63 Features
85 Overall
71
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Updated by Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 375g - 127 x 96 x 58mm
- Introduced January 2014
- Succeeded the Samsung NX20
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX30 Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX30, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-70 (16MP) and the NX30 (20MP) is fairly well matched but the WG-70 (1/2.3") and NX30 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The WG-70 was revealed 6 years after the NX30 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX30 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the WG-70 matches up against the NX30 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX30 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-70 & Samsung NX30. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery & Samsung NX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung NX30
WG-70 | NX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2020 | ![]() | January 2014 | More modern by 75 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX30 over the Ricoh WG-70
NX30 | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1036k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+806k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung NX30
WG-70 | NX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX30 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-70 features exterior measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung NX30 has proportions of 127mm x 96mm x 58mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.3") along with a weight of 375 grams (0.83 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX30 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the WG-70 and the NX30.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ce6b/4ce6b5948efe3c4de9d82769c3f2033c967aa018" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX30 size comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX30 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-70 and NX30 is 91 and 75 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cea6c/cea6c0fdd70e0be35c2ca613cee86cabbee1cd6f" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX30 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX30 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX30 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by looking at specifications. The picture underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-70 and NX30.
Plainly, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The WG-70 using its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Samsung NX30 will give you greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images far more aggressively. The more recent WG-70 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/938eb/938eb243384d90d59c820b4abc6cdad3fb38abb9" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX30 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX30 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX30 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/493d8/493d8a9922ac4fed54054b744354ffae06350075" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX30 Specifications
Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung NX30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung NX30 |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2020-02-04 | 2014-01-03 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | DRIMeIV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,036 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.66x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash modes | On, off | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) | 375 grams (0.83 pounds) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 127 x 96 x 58mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 77 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1014 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 360 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BP1410 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $280 | $699 |