Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SH100
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
99 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SH100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced February 2020
- New Model is Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 54 x 19mm
- Launched January 2011
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SH100 Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Ricoh WG-70 versus Samsung SH100, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-70 (16MP) and the SH100 (14MP) is fairly close and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-70 was announced 9 years after the SH100 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SH100 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the WG-70 scores vs the SH100 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SH100 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-70 & Samsung SH100. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery & Samsung SH100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung SH100
| WG-70 | SH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2020 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 111 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung SH100 over the Ricoh WG-70
| SH100 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung SH100
| WG-70 | SH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SH100 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-70 provides outside dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung SH100 has dimensions of 93mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-70 versus Samsung SH100 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the WG-70 and the SH100.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-70 and SH100 is 91 and 99 respectively.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SH100 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to envision the gap in sensor sizes merely by researching a spec sheet. The picture underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-70 and SH100.
Clearly, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-70 to result in more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The fresher WG-70 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SH100 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SH100 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung SH100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung SH100 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2020-02-04 | 2011-01-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4230 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 125 | - |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash modes | On, off | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193 gr (0.43 lb) | - |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 93 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $280 | $200 |
