Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL102
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched February 2020
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
The following is a complete review of the Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL102, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the WG-70 (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-70 was unveiled 11 years after the SL102 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a concise view of how the WG-70 scores vs the SL102 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-70 & Samsung SL102. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung SL102
| WG-70 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2020 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 135 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Ricoh WG-70
| SL102 | WG-70 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung SL102
| WG-70 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-70 has external dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the WG-70 versus the SL102.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-70 and SL102 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by viewing a spec sheet. The image below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-70 and SL102.
Clearly, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-70 to provide you with more detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a little more aggressively. The more recent WG-70 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung SL102 |
| Otherwise known as | - | ES55 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2020-02-04 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | On, off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193g (0.43 lbs) | 116g (0.26 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $280 | $130 |