Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung ST30
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
98 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung ST30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 87g - 82 x 52 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung ST30 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Ricoh WG-70 versus Samsung ST30, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the WG-70 (16MP) and ST30 (10MP) and the WG-70 (1/2.3") and ST30 (1/3") feature different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-70 was launched 9 years after the ST30 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST30 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the WG-70 matches up vs the ST30 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung ST30 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-70 & Samsung ST30. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery & Samsung ST30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung ST30
| WG-70 | ST30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2020 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 111 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST30 over the Ricoh WG-70
| ST30 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung ST30
| WG-70 | ST30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung ST30 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-70 provides outer dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung ST30 has dimensions of 82mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.2" x 2.0" x 0.7") having a weight of 87 grams (0.19 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-70 versus Samsung ST30 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-70 and the ST30.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-70 and ST30 is 91 and 98 respectively.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung ST30 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to picture the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading a spec sheet. The pic underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-70 and ST30.
As you can see, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WG-70 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Ricoh WG-70 will offer more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The newer WG-70 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung ST30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung ST30 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung ST30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung ST30 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2020-02-04 | 2011-01-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 4.8 x 3.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 17.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | - |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | () |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 7.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash options | On, off | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193g (0.43 pounds) | 87g (0.19 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 82 x 52 x 17mm (3.2" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $280 | $55 |