Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung ST600
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
95 Imaging
37 Features
40 Overall
38
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung ST600 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced February 2020
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 150g - 104 x 60 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung ST600 Overview
Following is a in depth assessment of the Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung ST600, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-70 (16MP) and the ST600 (14MP) is fairly comparable and they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-70 was released 10 years after the ST600 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST600 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the WG-70 grades vs the ST600 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung ST600 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung ST600. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery and Samsung ST600 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung ST600
| WG-70 | ST600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2020 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 123 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST600 over the Ricoh WG-70
| ST600 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Display resolution | 1152k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+922k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung ST600
| WG-70 | ST600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung ST600 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-70 enjoys physical measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung ST600 has specifications of 104mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung ST600 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the WG-70 compared to the ST600.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-70 and ST600 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung ST600 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes only by going through a spec sheet. The image underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-70 and ST600.
Clearly, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-70 to show greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images far more aggressively. The fresher WG-70 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung ST600 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung ST600 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung ST600 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung ST600 |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2020-02-04 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 4800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-135mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3.5" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,152 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) | 150 gr (0.33 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 104 x 60 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | SLB07 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $280 | $330 |
