Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5df4a/5df4a7bd7b9b88dd2f51805c9d7765d7c23b749f" alt="Ricoh WG-70 front Ricoh WG-70 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d6c3/8d6c3208a98a04c133c77814dcb12d444671965b" alt="Samsung TL240 front Samsung TL240 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched February 2020
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Also referred to as ST5000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Following is a detailed overview of the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung TL240, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-70 (16MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The WG-70 was introduced 10 years after the TL240 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the WG-70 grades against the TL240 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung TL240. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung TL240
WG-70 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2020 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 123 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Ricoh WG-70
TL240 | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung TL240
WG-70 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-70 enjoys outer dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL240 has specifications of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung TL240 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-70 against the TL240.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ddba/5ddba31a1a7d2a967d9bf2db1cf0183978106858" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240 size comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-70 and TL240 is 91 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4383d/4383d5286d572c159244ec6eed9861982292187b" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by looking at specifications. The pic below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-70 and TL240.
Plainly, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-70 to give greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more recent WG-70 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a7e4/1a7e48ee939165b6b856899e3875be0ca196a186" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/288ca/288cab59099dc2239d2d6819f924c7ec3a987824" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung TL240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung TL240 |
Alternate name | - | ST5000 |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2020-02-04 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4334 x 3256 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 4800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) | 160 gr (0.35 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $280 | $171 |