Clicky

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240

Portability
91
Imaging
43
Features
39
Overall
41
Ricoh WG-70 front
 
Samsung TL240 front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
32
Overall
34

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Launched February 2020
  • Refreshed by Ricoh WG-80
Samsung TL240
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 4800 (Bump to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
  • 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
  • Revealed January 2010
  • Also referred to as ST5000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240 Overview

Following is a detailed overview of the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung TL240, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-70 (16MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The WG-70 was introduced 10 years after the TL240 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the WG-70 grades against the TL240 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung TL240

 WG-70 TL240 
RevealedFebruary 2020January 2010More modern by 123 months
Focus manually More exact focus

Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Ricoh WG-70

 TL240 WG-70 
Display size3.5"2.7"Larger display (+0.8")
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung TL240

 WG-70 TL240 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-70 enjoys outer dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL240 has specifications of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).

Compare the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung TL240 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-70 against the TL240.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-70 and TL240 is 91 and 95 respectively.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be tough to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by looking at specifications. The pic below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-70 and TL240.

Plainly, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-70 to give greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more recent WG-70 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Portrait photography advice
Samsung TL240 Portrait photography advice
42
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
has face detection focusing
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
28
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
no manual control
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 as a Street photography camera
Samsung TL240 as a Street photography camera
62
has image stabilization (Digital)
weather proofing
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
60
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with touch to focus
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
more heavy than others in class (160g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Sports photography features
Samsung TL240 Sports photography features
50
has image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count good (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
weather proofing
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
43
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
has tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Travel photography features
Samsung TL240 Travel photography features
71
weather proofing
megapixel count good (16MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.5)
60
comes with touch to focus
decent megapixels (14MP)
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse recording
more heavy than others in class (160g)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (31mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-70
Landscape photography with Samsung TL240
49
has manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count good (16MP)
weather proofing
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
37
very good size screen (3.5")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (31mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
no manual control
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh WG-70
Vlogging with Samsung TL240
33
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
has face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
lack of external mic socket
27
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (31mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone port
more heavy than others in class (160 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung TL240
 Ricoh WG-70Samsung TL240
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh WG-70 Samsung TL240
Alternate name - ST5000
Type Waterproof Ultracompact
Launched 2020-02-04 2010-01-06
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4334 x 3256
Maximum native ISO 6400 4800
Maximum enhanced ISO - 6400
Min native ISO 125 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 31-217mm (7.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/3.3-5.5
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3.5 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) 5.00 m
Flash settings On, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Yes (Wireless) None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 193 gr (0.43 pounds) 160 gr (0.35 pounds)
Physical dimensions 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photos -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID - SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $280 $171