Clicky

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL320

Portability
91
Imaging
43
Features
39
Overall
41
Ricoh WG-70 front
 
Samsung TL320 front
Portability
98
Imaging
34
Features
36
Overall
34

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Introduced February 2020
  • Replacement is Ricoh WG-80
Samsung TL320
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
  • n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
  • Announced February 2009
  • Alternative Name is WB1000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL320 Overview

On this page, we will be matching up the Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL320, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the WG-70 (16MP) and TL320 (12MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The WG-70 was announced 11 years later than the TL320 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the WG-70 grades versus the TL320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung TL320

 WG-70 TL320 
AnnouncedFebruary 2020February 2009Fresher by 134 months

Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Ricoh WG-70

 TL320 WG-70 
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung TL320

 WG-70 TL320 
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-70 enjoys exterior measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung TL320 has sizing of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Check the Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the WG-70 compared to the TL320.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL320 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the WG-70 and TL320 is 91 and 98 respectively.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL320 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing just by checking a spec sheet. The visual below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-70 and TL320.

As you can see, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should expect the Ricoh WG-70 to give extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The newer WG-70 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL320 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Portrait photography factors
Samsung TL320 Portrait photography factors
42
you can focus manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
offers face detection focusing
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
33
you can focus manually
comes with face detection focus
external flash not possible
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Street photography information
Samsung TL320 Street photography information
62
image stabilization (Digital)
environment proofing
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
58
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Sports photography factors
Samsung TL320 Sports photography factors
50
image stabilization (Digital)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
environment proofing
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
29
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Travel photography advice
Samsung TL320 Travel photography advice
71
environment proofing
good resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
59
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
resolution not great (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Landscape photography information
Samsung TL320 Landscape photography information
49
you can focus manually
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
environment proofing
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7")
no manual control
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
43
you can focus manually
quite wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh WG-70
Vlogging with Samsung TL320
33
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
offers face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
no external microphone port
31
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focus
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external mic support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung TL320
 Ricoh WG-70Samsung TL320
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh WG-70 Samsung TL320
Also called - WB1000
Category Waterproof Ultracompact
Introduced 2020-02-04 2009-02-23
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Min native ISO 125 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 24-120mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/2.8-5.8
Macro focusing range 1cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 16 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) 5.00 m
Flash settings On, off Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Yes (Wireless) None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 193g (0.43 lb) -
Physical dimensions 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photos -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $280 $380