Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL320
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Announced February 2009
- Alternative Name is WB1000
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL320, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the WG-70 (16MP) and TL320 (12MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WG-70 was announced 11 years later than the TL320 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the WG-70 grades versus the TL320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung TL320. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery and Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung TL320
WG-70 | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2020 | February 2009 | Fresher by 134 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Ricoh WG-70
TL320 | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung TL320
WG-70 | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-70 enjoys exterior measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung TL320 has sizing of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the WG-70 compared to the TL320.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the WG-70 and TL320 is 91 and 98 respectively.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing just by checking a spec sheet. The visual below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-70 and TL320.
As you can see, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should expect the Ricoh WG-70 to give extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The newer WG-70 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung TL320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung TL320 |
Also called | - | WB1000 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2020-02-04 | 2009-02-23 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | On, off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193g (0.43 lb) | - |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $280 | $380 |