Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL500
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Additionally Known as EX1
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
Here is a extensive overview of the Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL500, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the WG-70 (16MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the WG-70 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") use different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-70 was launched 9 years later than the TL500 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise summary of how the WG-70 scores versus the TL500 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung TL500. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery and Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung TL500
WG-70 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2020 | July 2010 | Fresher by 117 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Ricoh WG-70
TL500 | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Sharper screen (+384k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung TL500
WG-70 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-70 comes with external dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL500 has dimensions of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL500 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the WG-70 and the TL500.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-70 and TL500 is 91 and 88 respectively.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by looking through specs. The visual here should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-70 and TL500.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The WG-70 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Ricoh WG-70 will result in greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more recent WG-70 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung TL500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung TL500 |
Alternate name | - | EX1 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2020-02-04 | 2010-07-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/1.8-2.4 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.20 m |
Flash settings | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) | 386 gr (0.85 lbs) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 40 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 129 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $280 | $527 |