Clicky

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB30F

Portability
91
Imaging
43
Features
39
Overall
41
Ricoh WG-70 front
 
Samsung WB30F front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
33
Overall
36

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs

Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Introduced February 2020
  • Replacement is Ricoh WG-80
Samsung WB30F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
  • Announced January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB30F Overview

Let's look a bit more closely at the Ricoh WG-70 versus Samsung WB30F, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-70 (16MP) and the WB30F (16MP) is relatively well matched and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The WG-70 was introduced 7 years after the WB30F which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple summary of how the WG-70 scores versus the WB30F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung WB30F

 WG-70 WB30F 
AnnouncedFebruary 2020January 2013Newer by 87 months
Focus manually More precise focus

Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Ricoh WG-70

 WB30F WG-70 
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung WB30F

 WG-70 WB30F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison

If you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-70 enjoys physical dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung WB30F has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).

Contrast the Ricoh WG-70 versus Samsung WB30F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view size comparison of the WG-70 against the WB30F.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB30F size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-70 and WB30F is 91 and 96 respectively.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specs. The picture here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-70 and WB30F.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical MP and you should expect similar quality of photographs but you really should factor the release date of the products into consideration. The more modern WG-70 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB30F as a Portrait photography camera
42
you can focus manually
good resolution (16MP)
has face detect focusing
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
34
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB30F as a Street photography camera
62
image stabilization (Digital)
environment proofing
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
63
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (128 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Sports photography features
Samsung WB30F Sports photography features
50
image stabilization (Digital)
good resolution (16MP)
has tracking focus
environment proofing
no shutter priority
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
44
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Travel photography advice
Samsung WB30F Travel photography advice
71
environment proofing
good resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
does not offer selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
69
lighter than average (128g)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.1)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-70
Landscape photography with Samsung WB30F
49
you can focus manually
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
environment proofing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
manual exposure not available
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
43
decently wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
manual mode not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh WG-70
Vlogging with Samsung WB30F
33
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
has face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not offer selfie friendly display
missing microphone support
33
decently wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
lighter than average (128 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic support
Photography Glossary

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung WB30F
 Ricoh WG-70Samsung WB30F
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh WG-70 Samsung WB30F
Type Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2020-02-04 2013-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 125 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focus range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology - QVGA TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) -
Flash settings On, off -
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Yes (Wireless) Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 193 grams (0.43 pounds) 128 grams (0.28 pounds)
Dimensions 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photos -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Retail price $280 $180