Clicky

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB350F

Portability
91
Imaging
43
Features
39
Overall
41
Ricoh WG-70 front
 
Samsung WB350F front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Introduced February 2020
  • Successor is Ricoh WG-80
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Announced January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB350F Overview

Here, we will be analyzing the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung WB350F, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-70 (16MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The WG-70 was introduced 6 years after the WB350F which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the WG-70 matches up versus the WB350F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung WB350F

 WG-70 WB350F 
AnnouncedFebruary 2020January 2014More modern by 74 months

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Ricoh WG-70

 WB350F WG-70 
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung WB350F

 WG-70 WB350F 
Manual focus Very accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry around your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-70 features outer dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has sizing of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

See the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung WB350F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the WG-70 compared to the WB350F.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the WG-70 and WB350F is 91 and 90 respectively.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its tough to see the difference between sensor sizes merely by reviewing technical specs. The pic below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-70 and WB350F.

As you have seen, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact MP so you should expect similar quality of photographs but you would want to factor the production date of the products into consideration. The more recent WG-70 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Portrait photography information
Samsung WB350F Portrait photography information
42
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
offers face detect focusing
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
40
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Street photography factors
Samsung WB350F Street photography factors
62
built in image stabilization (Digital)
weather proofing
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
61
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (276g)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Sports photography highlights
Samsung WB350F Sports photography highlights
50
built in image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
weather proofing
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
50
incredible zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Travel photography camera
71
weather proofing
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
does not feature selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
69
lighter than competitors (276g)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (23mm)
long reach (483mm)
missing Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Landscape photography features
Samsung WB350F Landscape photography features
49
has manual focus
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
weather proofing
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
50
manual focus
pretty wide (23mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
missing Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Vlogging details
Samsung WB350F Vlogging details
33
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
offers face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not feature selfie friendly display
doesn't have mic jack
34
pretty wide (23mm)
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors (276g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing microphone port
Photography Glossary

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung WB350F
 Ricoh WG-70Samsung WB350F
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh WG-70 Samsung WB350F
Class Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2020-02-04 2014-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 125 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 9 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 16 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) -
Flash options On, off -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Yes (Wireless) Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 193 gr (0.43 lbs) 276 gr (0.61 lbs)
Physical dimensions 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 pictures -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID - SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) -
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at release $280 $260