Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5df4a/5df4a7bd7b9b88dd2f51805c9d7765d7c23b749f" alt="Ricoh WG-70 front Ricoh WG-70 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f04d9/f04d99e0c26c31be60485c208bc04019fbc69c93" alt="Sigma DP2 Merrill front Sigma DP2 Merrill front"
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released February 2020
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Announced February 2012
- Earlier Model is Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Updated by Sigma DP3 Merrill
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Ricoh WG-70 and Sigma DP2 Merrill, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the WG-70 (16MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is relatively close but the WG-70 (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) use different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The WG-70 was introduced 8 years later than the DP2 Merrill and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the WG-70 grades against the DP2 Merrill with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-70 & Sigma DP2 Merrill. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
WG-70 | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2020 | ![]() | February 2012 | More recent by 98 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Ricoh WG-70
DP2 Merrill | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Sigma DP2 Merrill
WG-70 | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-70 features outside dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Merrill has specifications of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-70 and Sigma DP2 Merrill in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the WG-70 against the DP2 Merrill.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a78c5/a78c54b4ad7dfbb9b484366dd8adb248e5543f12" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill size comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-70 and DP2 Merrill is 91 and 83 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63f3c/63f3ceb12d480c265772ae78868d9db96f93b01c" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by looking through specifications. The visual here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-70 and DP2 Merrill.
To sum up, both of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WG-70 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Ricoh WG-70 will render more detail using its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The fresher WG-70 provides an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdd20/cdd20a2096102cf9dcb04275261b054846f0e35d" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5351a/5351ac43cacc4b4a83b10611020ff1343c86eb02" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Ricoh WG-70 | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh WG-70 | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2020-02-04 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4704 x 3136 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | On, off | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640x480 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) | 330 grams (0.73 pounds) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $280 | $931 |