Clicky

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
91
Imaging
43
Features
39
Overall
41
Ricoh WG-70 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Launched February 2020
  • Renewed by Ricoh WG-80
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Launched February 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Its time to examine more in depth at the Ricoh WG-70 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Sigma. The resolution of the WG-70 (16MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is very comparable but the WG-70 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) possess different sensor size.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The WG-70 was launched 6 years later than the DP2 Quattro and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple summary of how the WG-70 scores vs the DP2 Quattro with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 WG-70 DP2 Quattro 
LaunchedFebruary 2020February 2014Fresher by 73 months

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Ricoh WG-70

 DP2 Quattro WG-70 
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 WG-70 DP2 Quattro 
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to carry your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-70 offers external measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has specifications of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

See the Ricoh WG-70 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the WG-70 against the DP2 Quattro.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-70 and DP2 Quattro is 91 and 70 respectively.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizing simply by checking out specifications. The graphic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-70 and DP2 Quattro.

To sum up, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The WG-70 because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will show more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The more recent WG-70 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Portrait photography advice
Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography advice
42
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect autofocus
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
77
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 as a Street photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Street photography camera
62
has image stabilization (Digital)
environment proofing
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
61
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
no moving screen
no image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Sports photography information
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography information
50
has image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
environment proofing
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
48
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
fixed focal length (45mm)
max fps low (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
no phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh WG-70
Travel photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
71
environment proofing
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
53
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Landscape photography details
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography details
49
focusing manually
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
environment proofing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7")
no manual control
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
59
has manual focus
decent sized screen (3 inches)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (45mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 as a Vlogging camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Vlogging camera
33
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
comes with face detect autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
no mic socket
9
no video
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-70 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Ricoh WG-70Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Company Ricoh Sigma
Model type Ricoh WG-70 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Category Waterproof Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2020-02-04 2014-02-13
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TRUE III engine
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 5424 x 3616
Highest native ISO 6400 6400
Min native ISO 125 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 45mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/2.8
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) no built-in flash
Flash options On, off no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Yes (Wireless) None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 193 gr (0.43 pounds) 395 gr (0.87 pounds)
Dimensions 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 shots -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID - BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card -
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $280 $931