Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma fp
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5df4a/5df4a7bd7b9b88dd2f51805c9d7765d7c23b749f" alt="Ricoh WG-70 front Ricoh WG-70 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d2fe/1d2fed2caf199c62565b698420d940e61084850d" alt="Sigma fp front Sigma fp front"
84 Imaging
75 Features
79 Overall
76
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma fp Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Raise to 102400)
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 422g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
- Released July 2019
- Updated by Sigma fp L
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma fp Overview
In this write-up, we will be contrasting the Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma fp, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the WG-70 (16MP) and fp (25MP) and the WG-70 (1/2.3") and fp (Full frame) enjoy totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The WG-70 was released 7 months after the fp so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Sigma fp being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the WG-70 scores versus the fp in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma fp Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-70 & Sigma fp. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery & Sigma fp Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Sigma fp
WG-70 | fp | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2020 | ![]() | July 2019 | Newer by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma fp over the Ricoh WG-70
fp | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.2" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 2100k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+1870k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Sigma fp
WG-70 | fp | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma fp Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-70 has got outer dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sigma fp has dimensions of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") with a weight of 422 grams (0.93 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma fp in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the WG-70 and the fp.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa439/aa4394a0ddb4a0593c1aa9cbc72915a074c72892" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma fp size comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma fp size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-70 and fp is 91 and 84 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42b2e/42b2e8a6fd05a94788be4f65771f519b2b16dc4f" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma fp top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma fp top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma fp Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specs. The pic below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-70 and fp.
All in all, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The WG-70 because of its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh trickier and the Sigma fp will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 9MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more recent WG-70 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c698f/c698f2a72d2da5e6909260e8adfe3c16141afeab" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma fp sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma fp sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma fp Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83d6e/83d6e7928628983cca98a05b040207116ba473be" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma fp Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma fp Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma fp Specifications
Ricoh WG-70 | Sigma fp | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model type | Ricoh WG-70 | Sigma fp |
Type | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2020-02-04 | 2019-07-11 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 23.9mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 858.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 25 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 6 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Leica L |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 30 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3.2 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 2,100 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | On, off | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | No |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lb) | 422 grams (0.93 lb) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 wec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $280 | $2,050 |