Clicky

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma Quattro H

Portability
91
Imaging
43
Features
39
Overall
41
Ricoh WG-70 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro H front
Portability
78
Imaging
72
Features
59
Overall
66

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs

Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Revealed February 2020
  • Renewed by Ricoh WG-80
Sigma Quattro H
(Full Review)
  • 45MP - APS-H Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Announced February 2016
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview

Following is a extended analysis of the Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma Quattro H, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Sigma. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the WG-70 (16MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the WG-70 (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) have totally different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The WG-70 was revealed 4 years after the Quattro H which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the WG-70 matches up versus the Quattro H when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Sigma Quattro H

 WG-70 Quattro H 
AnnouncedFebruary 2020February 2016More modern by 49 months

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Ricoh WG-70

 Quattro H WG-70 
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1620k230kClearer screen (+1390k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Sigma Quattro H

 WG-70 Quattro H 
Manual focus Dial exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Neither has Touch screen

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry around your camera, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-70 has physical dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro H has measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Check out the Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma Quattro H in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the WG-70 compared to the Quattro H.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma Quattro H size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-70 and Quattro H is 91 and 78 respectively.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma Quattro H top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes simply by going over technical specs. The pic underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-70 and Quattro H.

As you have seen, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WG-70 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Sigma Quattro H will offer extra detail because of its extra 29MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more recent WG-70 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma Quattro H sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Portrait photography details
Sigma Quattro H Portrait photography details
42
focusing manually
decent megapixels (16MP)
includes face detect focusing
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
83
you can focus manually
excellent megapixels (45 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-H)
features face detection focusing
exports RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh WG-70
Street photography with Sigma Quattro H
62
has image stabilization (Digital)
weather sealing
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
70
decent sensor size (APS-H)
exports RAW files
weather proof
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma Quattro H as a Sports photography camera
50
has image stabilization (Digital)
decent megapixels (16MP)
includes tracking focus
weather sealing
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
71
excellent megapixels (45 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-H)
features tracking autofocus
weather proof
has phase detect AF
max fps low (3.8 fps)
lack of image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Travel photography advice
Sigma Quattro H Travel photography advice
71
weather sealing
decent megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
65
weather proof
excellent megapixels (45MP)
does not have Timelapse function
doesn't have selfie friendly display
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma Quattro H as a Landscape photography camera
49
focusing manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
weather sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual mode not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
75
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
excellent megapixels (45MP)
decent sensor size (APS-H)
exports RAW files
weather proof
lack of image stabilization
does not have Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Vlogging factors
Sigma Quattro H Vlogging factors
33
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
includes face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have mic support
26
features face detection focusing
doesn't have selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low quality video ( pxls)
does not have external microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-70 and Sigma Quattro H
 Ricoh WG-70Sigma sd Quattro H
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Sigma
Model Ricoh WG-70 Sigma sd Quattro H
Class Waterproof Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2020-02-04 2016-02-23
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - Dual TRUE III
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-H
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 26.6 x 17.9mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 476.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 45MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 6200 x 4152
Highest native ISO 6400 6400
Lowest native ISO 125 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.5 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 76
Crop factor 5.8 1.4
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7" 3"
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 1,620 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 3.8 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) no built-in flash
Flash settings On, off no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 -
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Yes (Wireless) None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 193 gr (0.43 pounds) -
Physical dimensions 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 pictures -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model - BP-61
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $280 $1,134