Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony A200
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
66 Imaging
48 Features
38 Overall
44
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched February 2020
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Released July 2008
- Renewed by Sony A230
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony A200 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Ricoh WG-70 versus Sony A200, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the WG-70 (16MP) and A200 (10MP) and the WG-70 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) offer different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WG-70 was brought out 11 years after the A200 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the WG-70 scores against the A200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony A200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-70 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Sony A200
| WG-70 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2020 | July 2008 | More modern by 141 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Ricoh WG-70
| A200 | WG-70 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Sony A200
| WG-70 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal screen dimensions | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-70 provides physical measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sony A200 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-70 versus Sony A200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the WG-70 vs the A200.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-70 and A200 is 91 and 66 respectively.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out technical specs. The picture underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-70 and A200.
As you can tell, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The WG-70 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Ricoh WG-70 will provide more detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The younger WG-70 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony A200 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-70 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-70 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
| Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2020-02-04 | 2008-07-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | On, off | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) | 572 grams (1.26 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 521 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Compact Flash |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $280 | $100 |