Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony A200
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
66 Imaging
48 Features
38 Overall
44
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched February 2020
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Released July 2008
- Renewed by Sony A230
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony A200 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Ricoh WG-70 versus Sony A200, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the WG-70 (16MP) and A200 (10MP) and the WG-70 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) offer different sensor sizes.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe WG-70 was brought out 11 years after the A200 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the WG-70 scores against the A200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony A200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-70 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Sony A200
| WG-70 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2020 | July 2008 | More modern by 141 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Ricoh WG-70
| A200 | WG-70 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Sony A200
| WG-70 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal screen dimensions | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-70 provides physical measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sony A200 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-70 versus Sony A200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the WG-70 vs the A200.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-70 and A200 is 91 and 66 respectively.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out technical specs. The picture underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-70 and A200.
As you can tell, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The WG-70 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Ricoh WG-70 will provide more detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The younger WG-70 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony A200 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-70 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-70 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
| Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2020-02-04 | 2008-07-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | On, off | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) | 572 grams (1.26 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 521 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Compact Flash |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $280 | $100 |