Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX200V
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
66 Imaging
41 Features
55 Overall
46
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced February 2020
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Revealed May 2012
- Older Model is Sony HX100V
- Replacement is Sony HX300
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX200V Overview
Here is a in depth review of the Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX200V, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-70 (16MP) and the HX200V (18MP) is relatively close and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-70 was introduced 7 years later than the HX200V and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summation of how the WG-70 matches up versus the HX200V with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX200V Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-70 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery & Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Sony HX200V
| WG-70 | HX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2020 | May 2012 | Fresher by 95 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Ricoh WG-70
| HX200V | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Sony HX200V
| WG-70 | HX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-70 has outer dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sony HX200V has specifications of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX200V in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-70 versus the HX200V.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-70 and HX200V is 91 and 66 respectively.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing only by researching specifications. The photograph below may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-70 and HX200V.
Plainly, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Sony HX200V to provide you with extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The newer WG-70 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX200V Specifications
| Ricoh WG-70 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-70 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2020-02-04 | 2012-05-11 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 12.40 m |
| Flash options | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193g (0.43 lb) | 583g (1.29 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | 450 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $280 | $480 |