Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX300
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced February 2020
- New Model is Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Released February 2013
- Old Model is Sony HX200V
- Replacement is Sony HX400V
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX300 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX300, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-70 (16MP) and the HX300 (20MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-70 was launched 7 years after the HX300 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the WG-70 matches up against the HX300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX300 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-70 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Sony HX300
| WG-70 | HX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2020 | February 2013 | More modern by 85 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Ricoh WG-70
| HX300 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Sony HX300
| WG-70 | HX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-70 has got physical measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sony HX300 has measurements of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") and a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-70 vs the HX300.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-70 and HX300 is 91 and 63 respectively.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizes purely by going through a spec sheet. The pic here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-70 and HX300.
Clearly, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Sony HX300 to produce more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The fresher WG-70 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX300 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-70 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-70 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2020-02-04 | 2013-02-20 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash options | On, off | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193g (0.43 lb) | 623g (1.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $280 | $339 |