Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony S2000
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced February 2020
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Launched January 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony S2000 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Ricoh WG-70 versus Sony S2000, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Sony. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the WG-70 (16MP) and S2000 (10MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-70 was unveiled 10 years later than the S2000 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the WG-70 matches up vs the S2000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony S2000 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-70 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery & Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Sony S2000
| WG-70 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2020 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 123 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Ricoh WG-70
| S2000 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Sony S2000
| WG-70 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-70 provides exterior dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sony S2000 has measurements of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-70 versus Sony S2000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-70 vs the S2000.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-70 and S2000 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to picture the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading through specs. The photograph underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-70 and S2000.
All in all, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can expect the Ricoh WG-70 to give you greater detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more modern WG-70 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony S2000 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-70 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-70 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2020-02-04 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1200 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $280 | $225 |
